Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Centre for Learning Innovation
QUT Home Faculty of Education
Contact us
CLI Home About CLI Research Areas Higher Degrees

iResearch Ed

Research Areas
Research Programs
Research Projects
Research Assistance
Research Ethics
Search for Research Interests
Achievements
Publications
Podcasts
  iResearch Ed

[Print-friendly version]

iResearch Ed is a series of podcasts that highlight the expertise of higher degree students and staff conducting research in the Centre for Learning Innovation.

 Subscribe now


 

Year 2008

A case for the inclusion of educational gerontology in adult education programs in Australian Universities play podcast
Cappy Engelbrecht

At the intersection of adult education and social gerontology, and propelled by the ageing phenomenon; educational gerontology has a critical place in the study of older adult education.  To contend with older learners’ needs, professional adult educators require an enhanced preparation, and concomitance to a reinvigoration of current adult learning programs to include the constructs of educational gerontology and the geragogical imperative.  Through survey and interviews, this research investigated evidence of, and the capacity for Australian Adult Education programs and Ageing Research centres to meet this requirement.  Results of this case study indicate a paucity of evidence of educational gerontology in adult education programs, coupled with significant potential for capacity development in this field through collaboration with Ageing Research initiatives.  The findings suggest an expansion of current curriculum in adult education programs to include aspects of educational gerontology, professional development of Adult Education academics in the specialized area of educational gerontology, and broader adult education engagement with external stakeholders and the ageing research community as a contribution to social betterment.



Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Views of Nature of Science by Engaging them in Argumentation in Scientific and Socioscientific Contexts play podcast
Christine McDonald

The current understanding of students’ group metacognition is based on a relatively small amount of research. The research has focused mainly on the development of strategies for problem solving. The potential for group solving to develop students’ group skills combined with problem solving skills has remained largely unexplored. This study sought to address the void by developing a conceptual model to inform the design of scaffolds to facilitate group metacognition during mathematical problem solving in CSCL environments. An initial conceptual framework based on the literature from metacognition, cooperative learning, cooperative group metacognition, and computer-supported collaborative learning was used to inform the study. In order to achieve the study aim, a design research methodology incorporating two cycles was used. The first cycle focused on within-group metacognition for sixteen groups working around the computer; the second cycle included between-group metacognition for six groups working within  a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, checklists, group diaries, and Knowledge Forum® notes. Data analysis incorporated the results from a constant comparison method of data analysis and results from identifying concepts from the conceptual framework and the literature review. The study found that providing groups with group metacognitive scaffolds resulted in groups planning, monitoring, and evaluating the task and team aspects of their group work. The metacognitive strategies allowed students to focus on how their group was completing the problem solving taks and working together as a team.